Wii U

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wii U sounds ghey but the console itself is wicked, I love the idea of having a "Pseudo-HandHeld" for a controller, new and creative.
 
Haven't had a chance to read much on it (I'm working & only home on break) but the concept doesn't really impress me much. Its essentially a handheld, but you have to be within range of a console to use it if I've read correctly. It might be as powerful as a PS3 as they're saying, but its still a tiny screen (not to mention, the PS3 has been out for several years so matching its graphics isn't that impressive since this isn't a legit handheld).

I think it will be the Wii all over again. People will be really excited for it, sales will crazy the first 2 years. Then it'll lose steam to other consoles.
 
Amatatomba said:
Haven't had a chance to read much on it (I'm working & only home on break) but the concept doesn't really impress me much. Its essentially a handheld, but you have to be within range of a console to use it if I've read correctly. It might be as powerful as a PS3 as they're saying, but its still a tiny screen (not to mention, the PS3 has been out for several years so matching its graphics isn't that impressive since this isn't a legit handheld).

I think it will be the Wii all over again. People will be really excited for it, sales will crazy the first 2 years. Then it'll lose steam to other consoles.

I believe the controller/handheld screen supplements the gameplay on the TV which you're meant to play at.
 
The name itself is really ghey and I don't like it.

WHY NOT THE NINTENDO REVOLUTION?!?!???!?!?!?

Anyway, not too excited for this system...I wish Nintendo would wait just a few more years or something...
 
Ken Masters said:
Amatatomba said:
Haven't had a chance to read much on it (I'm working & only home on break) but the concept doesn't really impress me much. Its essentially a handheld, but you have to be within range of a console to use it if I've read correctly. It might be as powerful as a PS3 as they're saying, but its still a tiny screen (not to mention, the PS3 has been out for several years so matching its graphics isn't that impressive since this isn't a legit handheld).

I think it will be the Wii all over again. People will be really excited for it, sales will crazy the first 2 years. Then it'll lose steam to other consoles.

I believe the controller/handheld screen supplements the gameplay on the TV which you're meant to play at.

See that's what I thought at first but then I skimmed an article that made it sound differently.

I don't really see how a supplementary screen would work though or the point. Like obviously you can't look at 2 screens at once (it's not like the DS where you can glance) so action on one screen would have to stop/slow so you could be on the other screen. I guess then they could use the handheld thing for aspects of a game that would be enhanced by a touchscreen but still seems kinda unnecessary.

It would be better if they were separate entirely but could be used together. Like how you could connect GBAs to the GCN, but way better. I guess then that would bring in a price issue though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top