Should Nintendo reduce the prices of Video Games?

Should they reduce the prices?

  • Yeah they should does Nintendo think were rich or something?

    Votes: 7 41.2%
  • The prices seem just fine to me.

    Votes: 9 52.9%
  • I'm not sure...

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • Total voters
    17
Status
Not open for further replies.
yoshi14 said:
Is anyone even noticing 60 dollar games from Sony? I think Nintendo is just fine. People are complaining about the price of good games that shouldn't be cheap.
Video games are only worth entertainment so why have Video game prices of 50$-200$ srsly Nintendo's getting greedy...they're not worth that much...at least prices of 35$-120$ couldn't hurt...
 
You guys really need to chill with these prices. Nintendo still has NES games priced at 25 dollars where i'm at, so I don't think they'll be doing any price reductions anytime soon. =P
 
I don't think the prices are that bad (then again I don't regularly buy many video games). If you think about how much work goes into a game, and how much use you get out of the good ones, its not that unreasonable. But prices should steadily come down as the game gets older.

I think DS games (the $40 ones) are the more ridiculously priced games. $30 for a handheld game is reasonable. $40 is not.
 
Pretty Cool Guy said:
They should make games $0.99 :)

I disagree. Nintendo's games would be selling too quick. Remember the laws of supply and demand? Video games have a decent supply and a great demand. So I think the prices will stay the same.

Cher said:
I don't think the prices are that bad (then again I don't regularly buy many video games). If you think about how much work goes into a game, and how much use you get out of the good ones, its not that unreasonable. But prices should steadily come down as the game gets older.

I think DS games (the $40 ones) are the more ridiculously priced games. $30 for a handheld game is reasonable. $40 is not.

Well, imagine 2 $30 games with average replayability VS 1 $40 with excellent replayability. This would make sense, and Pokemon is one of those games with the most replayability. They usually cost $40, while most of Nintendo's NintendoDS games are usually 30 dollars.

And the answer to the question is no. Nintendo shouldn't reduce the prices of video games. They should stay the same.
 
cookieboy17 said:
Charizard in case you didn't notice Matt (aka pretty cool guy) was being sarcastic.

I'll be Snowy here and say "CAPTAIN OBVIOUS AWAYYYYYYYYY"!~~~
 
Snowy620 said:
Let's make the PS3 and it's games free too.

How could they be too expensive?

Only little kids who don't actually work think they're expensive.
I never said they should make them free I just don't think games are worth that price srsly 50$ for 1 game?
They're just games and a simple dress is worth more than a game(obviously since we need to look good...unless ya like being naked...:p) then what's next they're gonna make prices like 200$-500$ and you guys still gonna think their prices are low...?
 
Mario. said:
Snowy620 said:
Let's make the PS3 and it's games free too.

How could they be too expensive?

Only little kids who don't actually work think they're expensive.
I never said they should make them free I just don't think games are worth that price srsly 50$ for 1 game?
They're just games and a simple dress is worth more than a game(obviously since we need to look good...unless ya like being naked...:p) then what's next they're gonna make prices like 200$-500$ and you guys still gonna think their prices are low...?
I'm assuming you don't understand the concept on sarcasm.

Really, Maria? $200-$500? Yeah for the console, the games will probably only be $60.

Nintendo games are the cheapest on the market.

If anyone should be complaining, it should be me an' Aegis, since new PS3 games are about $60.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top