Vote: No Lynch
Mario Party Mafia 2 (GAME OVER) (BOOS WIN)
- Thread starter Slacker
- Start date
I am on L-1 so unless you guys are riding the bandwagon for the lulz, hear me out.
Alright, so you're willing to use evidence outside the topic to establish a guilt of someone. To me in this game, it is an underhand tactic that is potentially a scumtell. In addition, in what way have I drawn attention to myself beyond trying to clarify why others are suspicious of me? If I were a Bob-omb, I wouldn't cast suspicion so early as it would ruin the gameplay - I'd risk killing Toads, y'know.
In addition, how can you be certain that I PMed Slacker? Yes he may have replied to me but unless you come up with something more definitive, I call BS.
Cry WIFOM as much as you like, Day and Night 1 with only a single kill is insufficient grounds.
By saying you believe someone without any prior involvement in this game is saying you're supporting that person religiously (metagame or not). How can I trust that comment for a Toadworthy voice, and not for Boo backup? This is scummy. Your point about Super Toad/Peach is fine. Don't forget both parties targetting the same victim.
Stop piggybacking off each other. The more scummy you play, the more suspicion you guys are casting on yourselves. It is not "TRUE" until I die or the Cop checks my alignment.
Pure OMGUS from last game. Idiot. Validate or you're marked.
To clear the issue around Kyle, I will quote my wording from the post I addressed to him:
That's for you to say. Don't take metagame or in-forum behavior to heart here. I cry OMGUS vote from you.
Billy and morteriser make some excellent points about bandwagoning and lulling me into a trap (look I'm at L-1 someone lynch me). Anyone's fair game at the moment, but if Billy's comment that the bandwagonners (apart from Berry) were MPM1 players, perhaps they're concealing their motives. Staryu was the first to pull an attempt at explaining from his mind, leading others to follow. I'm inclined to FoS Staryu for that.
@Aegis - Hi
@Cook - if you're being as unhelpful as you are, why are you playing?
@WAHA - typical vote - care to elaborate?
If I come off as aggressive, it's because I'm at L-1 with very appalling reasons as to why I should be lynched.
I would appreciate those who have accused to explain and address the questions I have posed.
Sunflora said:
Alright, so you're willing to use evidence outside the topic to establish a guilt of someone. To me in this game, it is an underhand tactic that is potentially a scumtell. In addition, in what way have I drawn attention to myself beyond trying to clarify why others are suspicious of me? If I were a Bob-omb, I wouldn't cast suspicion so early as it would ruin the gameplay - I'd risk killing Toads, y'know.
In addition, how can you be certain that I PMed Slacker? Yes he may have replied to me but unless you come up with something more definitive, I call BS.
Cry WIFOM as much as you like, Day and Night 1 with only a single kill is insufficient grounds.
Yoshi8984 said:
By saying you believe someone without any prior involvement in this game is saying you're supporting that person religiously (metagame or not). How can I trust that comment for a Toadworthy voice, and not for Boo backup? This is scummy. Your point about Super Toad/Peach is fine. Don't forget both parties targetting the same victim.
Dark Boo said:
Stop piggybacking off each other. The more scummy you play, the more suspicion you guys are casting on yourselves. It is not "TRUE" until I die or the Cop checks my alignment.
cookieboy17 said:Yeah I'm voting H-J I don't care if he's a Toad he's annoying.
Vote: H-J
Pure OMGUS from last game. Idiot. Validate or you're marked.
To clear the issue around Kyle, I will quote my wording from the post I addressed to him:
I am not condemning him for voting me at all. I said I wanted him to tell me any reason why I warrant suspicion besides my aforementioned reason of RVS.Ken Masters said:
Princess Zelda said:
That's for you to say. Don't take metagame or in-forum behavior to heart here. I cry OMGUS vote from you.
Billy and morteriser make some excellent points about bandwagoning and lulling me into a trap (look I'm at L-1 someone lynch me). Anyone's fair game at the moment, but if Billy's comment that the bandwagonners (apart from Berry) were MPM1 players, perhaps they're concealing their motives. Staryu was the first to pull an attempt at explaining from his mind, leading others to follow. I'm inclined to FoS Staryu for that.
@Aegis - Hi
@Cook - if you're being as unhelpful as you are, why are you playing?
@WAHA - typical vote - care to elaborate?
If I come off as aggressive, it's because I'm at L-1 with very appalling reasons as to why I should be lynched.
I would appreciate those who have accused to explain and address the questions I have posed.
EBWOP - there is the likelihood that Kyle used his ability to manipulate his fellow masons to vote me I guess. I realise they aren't anti-town but if the above hypothetical is true, why are you so convinced by Kyle's logic?
Nothing is a certainty until death as you should know by now.
Nothing is a certainty until death as you should know by now.
Wow H-J.
Lol
Lol
^Your opinion? I don't know if I reviewed any posts you made.
Dayum
Could you please be more specific? :/
No, it's just so detailed.Ken Masters said:
Ken Masters said:
The wayn you're sounding you sound like you're an Toad that is getting accused of nothing
>mfw I'm saying out of all this bullshit and I just want to get on with the game.
IT'S A GAME, PEOPLE.
IT'S A GAME, PEOPLE.
^lol
But yeah listen to Snowy on this point. I'm raging bc of my L-1, not bc of any grudges I may/may not be holding.
But yeah listen to Snowy on this point. I'm raging bc of my L-1, not bc of any grudges I may/may not be holding.
1. HJ was PM'ing someone, after, Slacker was viewing PMs, idk, sounds fishy to me.
2. Last game we lost member one by one cuz we kept deciding to "Not Lynch" and the Boos were making sure we didn't. I'm trying to insure that doesn't happen again, that's not suspicious at all.
3. This has NOTHING to Do with the last game, I don't bare any hatred towards you, that would be immautre.
4. You freaking out isn't helping change my mind, I mean, sure you'll be mad if someone framed you, but you wouldn't act crazy like HJ is now.
Those are my reasons on why I voted for you. If you're Toad, give me more proof that you are and I'll change my vote. I'm not here to get rid of Toads.
2. Last game we lost member one by one cuz we kept deciding to "Not Lynch" and the Boos were making sure we didn't. I'm trying to insure that doesn't happen again, that's not suspicious at all.
3. This has NOTHING to Do with the last game, I don't bare any hatred towards you, that would be immautre.
4. You freaking out isn't helping change my mind, I mean, sure you'll be mad if someone framed you, but you wouldn't act crazy like HJ is now.
Those are my reasons on why I voted for you. If you're Toad, give me more proof that you are and I'll change my vote. I'm not here to get rid of Toads.
What's wrong with freaking out if I'm at L-1? I found pretty much everyone's reasons rather pale, and yours is the mainlink from which the others hang. My argumentativeness is as I said from that. Are my reasons stating why I'm not a Bob-Omb sufficient?
What proof are you desiring? I think my position at this moment is that I'll probably drop off today (either phase), but that doesn't mean I can't probe you equally. Do you have any proof/claim that you are a Toad? Also, fishing for roles can be a scumtell, just as a passing comment.
Fishiness should not be judged from PMs just saying, otherwise I'll gladly pull one of those in front of you ragarding your scenario, but I see no gain from that.
I found pretty much everyone's reasons rather pale, and yours is the mainlink from which the others hang. My argumentativeness is as I said from that. Are my reasons stating why I'm not a Bob-Omb sufficient?What proof are you desiring? I think my position at this moment is that I'll probably drop off today (either phase), but that doesn't mean I can't probe you equally. Do you have any proof/claim that you are a Toad? Also, fishing for roles can be a scumtell, just as a passing comment.
Fishiness should not be judged from PMs just saying, otherwise I'll gladly pull one of those in front of you ragarding your scenario, but I see no gain from that.
Jesus Christ H-J. Though you're kinda swaying me to change my vote at the same time. Only thing is you randomly voted for someone on day 1, then Sushi claims he saw you PMing Slacker, and then you come in here and complain cause people are voting you. The vote on vote thing is just weird and almost hippocratic.
Only thing is H-J could have a different nighttime role other than a Boo. Boos aren't the only ones with a nighttime job, what if we kill the friggin Mario or something. Which is the main reason why I feel swayed to change my vote. I think it'll be a real slap in the face if we kill someone with a good role.
Edit: the fuck is a bob-omb?
Though you're kinda swaying me to change my vote at the same time. Only thing is you randomly voted for someone on day 1, then Sushi claims he saw you PMing Slacker, and then you come in here and complain cause people are voting you. The vote on vote thing is just weird and almost hippocratic. Only thing is H-J could have a different nighttime role other than a Boo. Boos aren't the only ones with a nighttime job, what if we kill the friggin Mario or something. Which is the main reason why I feel swayed to change my vote. I think it'll be a real slap in the face if we kill someone with a good role.
Edit: the fuck is a bob-omb?
SO voting someone out in the first reason isn't suspicious? Your reasoning is completely ridiculous.
See this is what i dont get, h-j if you're a toad just tell us you dont have to type 80 paragraphs about random shit. why are you typing 80 paragraphs?
Hippocratic?
But yeah, now you've cleared your reasons, I'll apologise for my rather unnecessary RAGE at you.
I've already established I voted RVS and that I was about to change it but saw that L+1 was already achieved.
@Staryu EBWOP - lynching me now has very little strategic benefit unless I'm SK or KB of which I am neither (unless you require proof of some sort >.>). Following from Cook:
If I am Mario (one of who knows how many), that means I wouldn't be able to establish the alignments of the three Boos.
If I am Peach, then there's no more protection.
If I am Magikoopa (one of who knows how many), there will be one less chance for any role (hopefully an anti-town) to be blocked.
Other roles don't have night actions, but they still don't provide any sizeable benefit (ESPECIALLY not if I were Bob-omb).
I know you're anxious on the kill opportunities of the SK and Boos, but I'll let you voice yourself on evidence and the WIFOM on PMs.
But yeah, now you've cleared your reasons, I'll apologise for my rather unnecessary RAGE at you.
I've already established I voted RVS and that I was about to change it but saw that L+1 was already achieved.
@Staryu EBWOP - lynching me now has very little strategic benefit unless I'm SK or KB of which I am neither (unless you require proof of some sort >.>). Following from Cook:
If I am Mario (one of who knows how many), that means I wouldn't be able to establish the alignments of the three Boos.
If I am Peach, then there's no more protection.
If I am Magikoopa (one of who knows how many), there will be one less chance for any role (hopefully an anti-town) to be blocked.
Other roles don't have night actions, but they still don't provide any sizeable benefit (ESPECIALLY not if I were Bob-omb).
I know you're anxious on the kill opportunities of the SK and Boos, but I'll let you voice yourself on evidence and the WIFOM on PMs.
Do you really think that the same person would be a boo twice in a row?
EBWOP in light of new posts:
@Cook - I am not a vanilla Toad, if that answers your question.
@Berry - RVS = random vote. It's a possible opening move for Day 1. And as I said, I was preparing to revert to No Lynch. Is that sufficient enough, or would you like me to type antoher 80 paragraphs?
@Cook - I am not a vanilla Toad, if that answers your question.
@Berry - RVS = random vote. It's a possible opening move for Day 1. And as I said, I was preparing to revert to No Lynch. Is that sufficient enough, or would you like me to type antoher 80 paragraphs?
And I agree with Cook. If we kill H-J and it turns out he had a valuable role, we're fucked. ( ；´Д｀)