H-J カービイ said:
Mario Party Legacy Brawl Leaderboard (now with less confusion!)
- Thread starter Troll
- Start date
- Status
Kinda dumb to count a sibling match.
well, he's a member here.cookieboy17 said:
The only thing I don't like is it will be a easy way for Socc3r to get up in the ranks, which is not cool.
Which is what I was thinking.Columbo said:well, he's a member here.cookieboy17 said:
The only thing I don't like is it will be a easy way for Socc3r to get up in the ranks, which is not cool.
If it gets out of control then I'll deal with it.cookieboy17 said:Which is what I was thinking.Columbo said:well, he's a member here.cookieboy17 said:
The only thing I don't like is it will be a easy way for Socc3r to get up in the ranks, which is not cool.
It's already out of control cause it's cheap to include a sibling fight. For all we know Sushi can easily brawl with his sister and count that as a legit battle, it's the same as counting socc and dg434535 or whatever the fuck.MattC13 said:If it gets out of control then I'll deal with it.cookieboy17 said:Which is what I was thinking.Columbo said:well, he's a member here.cookieboy17 said:
The only thing I don't like is it will be a easy way for Socc3r to get up in the ranks, which is not cool.
So should I just make a rule that doesn't allow people to Brawl with siblings on the same Wii or something?cookieboy17 said:It's already out of control cause it's cheap to include a sibling fight. For all we know Sushi can easily brawl with his sister and count that as a legit battle, it's the same as counting socc and dg434535 or whatever the F***.MattC13 said:If it gets out of control then I'll deal with it.cookieboy17 said:Which is what I was thinking.Columbo said:well, he's a member here.cookieboy17 said:
The only thing I don't like is it will be a easy way for Socc3r to get up in the ranks, which is not cool.
Exactly. If I did that, that would be cheating and I know it. ESPECIALLY since I know my sister wouldn't be good and I could easily beat her. I think that's what Socc3r is doing, I played his brother and all his brother does is spam, he doesn't know how to play well.cookieboy17 said:It's already out of control cause it's cheap to include a sibling fight. For all we know Sushi can easily brawl with his sister and count that as a legit battle, it's the same as counting socc and dg434535 or whatever the F***.MattC13 said:If it gets out of control then I'll deal with it.cookieboy17 said:Which is what I was thinking.Columbo said:well, he's a member here.cookieboy17 said:
The only thing I don't like is it will be a easy way for Socc3r to get up in the ranks, which is not cool.
Yea, unless you want me to get my sister to join the forum so I can play Brawl with her and win over and over again.MattC13 said:So should I just make a rule that doesn't allow people to Brawl with siblings on the same Wii or something?cookieboy17 said:It's already out of control cause it's cheap to include a sibling fight. For all we know Sushi can easily brawl with his sister and count that as a legit battle, it's the same as counting socc and dg434535 or whatever the F***.MattC13 said:If it gets out of control then I'll deal with it.cookieboy17 said:Which is what I was thinking.Columbo said:well, he's a member here.cookieboy17 said:
The only thing I don't like is it will be a easy way for Socc3r to get up in the ranks, which is not cool.
Or hell, I (aka socc) could just lie to save the time.
Alright, rules been implanted.
Objection.
What if you have siblings on the same Wii but including others as well? (i.e. 4forall)?
What if you have siblings on the same Wii but including others as well? (i.e. 4forall)?
Like that graph you showed (wherever the hell it is), then that's fine.H-J カービイ said:
I never did a 4forall graph. >.>
I mean that a match where there are siblings on a Wii and they Wifi with others for a 4forall.
Anyways, Imma going to update the graph soon with Socc's uncalled for 3-1? or 3-0 whomping of D51g.
@Cook: chill out.
I mean that a match where there are siblings on a Wii and they Wifi with others for a 4forall.
Anyways, Imma going to update the graph soon with Socc's uncalled for 3-1? or 3-0 whomping of D51g.
@Cook: chill out.
Well that's a bit more legit so yeah imo.H-J カービイ said:
And chill out? You think I'm screaming at my laptop over a Brawl Leaderboard? Please, I don't even like the game that much.
Wait, you're probably not ever going to be on the Leaderboard so why do you even care?cookieboy17 said:
So justice is served. 8)MattC13 said:Wait, you're probably not ever going to be on the Leaderboard so why do you even care?cookieboy17 said:
No, it's for the post pumping. /joking
So, we are agreeing on:
>1o1 MUST be played Wifi between two different consoles (i.e. no more SOcc/D51g matches)
>Any stage
>must be 3 stock, 3-5 min preferred
>only recording win-loss is essential, but everything else can be included if desired
And Socc, way to ruin a joke.
/jokingSo, we are agreeing on:
>1o1 MUST be played Wifi between two different consoles (i.e. no more SOcc/D51g matches)
>Any stage
>must be 3 stock, 3-5 min preferred
>only recording win-loss is essential, but everything else can be included if desired
And Socc, way to ruin a joke.
lol @ h-j
and Matt I probably can end up on the leaderboard but it'll probably be all L's.
and Matt I probably can end up on the leaderboard but it'll probably be all L's.
This is why I hate leaderboard/tourney/contest brawls.
Too many goddamn rules.
Too many goddamn rules.
there are only like 4 rulesKagami said:
- Status